Advancing the evidence base on support for kinship families

Deputy Chief Executive

Advancing the evidence base on support for kinship families

As we announce the launch of two new evaluations, our Deputy Chief Executive Donna Molloy reflects on our journey to improve the evidence base around kinship care, sharing more about how our new projects will help to fill critical evidence gaps and improve our understanding of how best to support kinship families.

Kinship carers play a crucial role, stepping in to provide children with safe, stable and loving homes and keeping them within their family network. Children in kinship care typically experience fewer placement and school moves and have better behavioural and mental health outcomes than those in non‑kin foster care. Census data suggests more than 140,000 children in England and Wales live in kinship arrangements – most in informal arrangements – yet many kinship families struggle to access tailored support. Kinship carers are also more likely to face financial hardship, live with disabilities, be from a minoritised ethnic background, or be single caregivers.

Kinship care is high on the national agenda, driven by rising numbers of children in kinship arrangements and growing government recognition of the value of supporting children to remain in their family networks. In 2024, the first statutory guidance for kinship care was published and the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill aims to strengthen support and recognition for kinship families, with a requirement for local authorities to publish their local kinship offer. The Children’s Minister has also committed to a pilot of financial allowances for kinship families this year.

Foundations is committed to ensuring that kinship families receive effective, timely support so they can stay together and thrive. To achieve this, it is vital that we understand what kind of support really works for families.

Building the UK evidence base: new pilot evaluations

Despite the important role they play, there remains a lack of high-quality UK evidence on how best to support kinship carers, as the Kinship Care Practice Guide, commissioned by the Department for Education and produced by Foundations in 2024, revealed. Based on the guide’s recommendations, we identified two types of support programmes for kinship families that show promise and need further evaluation in the UK: kinship navigator programmes, and therapeutic support for kinship carers and children in kinship care.

We’ve announced today that we have commissioned a pilot evaluation of Kinship Connected, an intensive 1:1 home and community-based support programme delivered by Kinship, which aims to improve the wellbeing, resilience and stability of kinship families. This will be carried out by the Centre for Evidence and Implementation (CEI) and Ipsos.

Navigator programmes like this one are designed to help carers better understand and access the complex landscape of services and support available to them. US evidence shows that these programmes can be effective, particularly in securing permanent placement arrangements for children, but we need more robust UK evidence on this.

We’ve also commissioned a pilot evaluation of The Just Right State – a therapeutic support programme for children in kinship care run by North Tyneside Council, which provides peer support and mentorship for kinship carers. This will be carried out by Verian. The research that underpinned the Practice Guide identified cognitive behavioral therapy-based approaches as effective for kinship carers; we want to find out more about the impact of these approaches in the UK and generate evidence on what works for children.

Looking ahead

From the Kinship Care Practice Guide to today’s announcements, we’re taking steps with our partners to build the evidence base on kinship support, but there’s more to do. The systematic review that informed the guide highlighted how structural inequalities and instances of racism shape the experiences of kinship carers from minoritised ethnic backgrounds. These carers face a disproportionately high risk of missing out on essential support. Both evaluations launched today will examine how programmes engage and support families from minoritised backgrounds, ensuring equity is embedded in both design and delivery.

Going forward, we are funding two qualitative research studies exploring the experiences of minoritised ethnic children and young people in kinship care – an area where evidence is particularly limited. We’ll have more news about this soon.

As national attention grows and local authorities develop stronger kinship offers, there is real momentum behind improving support for these families and recognising the vital role kinship carers play. As the national What Works Centre for Children & Families, we’ll continue to drive evidence-based change and champion effective support for kinship families. By strengthening the evidence on what works for kinship families and working closely with local areas to turn that evidence into practice, we can help ensure kinship carers and their children get the support they need.

SHARE

Related News

Read about our latest news and events

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.