Building the evidence to support kinship carers and the children they care for 

Director of Evidence

Building the evidence to support kinship carers and the children they care for 

Aoife O’Higgins, Director of Evidence announces our new funding call to strengthen the evidence base on what works to support kinship families. 

Last week Foundations launched a call for funding that invites Expressions of Interest from organisations which support kinship families and want to participate in high quality evaluation of their services. This work will build on the current evidence base about what works in kinship care and ensure all kinship families have the support they need.  

The call follows the publication on 14 October of the first national Practice Guide on Kinship Care, developed by Foundations and commissioned by the Department for Education. Drawing on the strongest available international evidence, the Practice Guide recommends the approaches that are most likely to keep kinship families together. However, the UK evidence base on how to support kinship carers is weak. To change this, our call aims to build on and strengthen the evidence about what works here.  

Doing this work matters because we know that kinship carers in England typically have unmet needs – they are more likely than non-kinship foster carers to live with disabilities, experience financial difficulties, or be single caregivers, for example. In addition, we know that there are substantial racial inequalities in kinship care and that families from minoritised backgrounds are less likely to get the support that they need. But research tells us that when all kinship families are adequately supported, kinship care can lead to better long-term outcomes for children and families in areas such as health, income, and family stability. 

For this call, we are particularly interested in funding programmes aligned with one or more following recommendations of the Kinship Care Practice Guide, including:  

  • Navigator and enhanced navigator programmes: these help kinship carers understand and access the complex landscape of services, resources, and support systems available to them.  
  • Therapeutic support for kinship carers and children in kinship care: Our review identified cognitive behavioural therapy-based approaches as effective for kinship carers. However, we also understand from our engagement with stakeholders that other types of therapeutic support are on offer to kinship carers. We are interested in enhancing the evidence base for these programmes. 

In addition, we are also interested in understanding the experiences of children in kinship care and to determine whether there are services specifically designed to meet their needs.  

Our work highlights that kinship carers from minoritised ethnic backgrounds experience structural inequalities and racism when seeking support; this limits their engagement. As a result, these families face a disproportionately higher risk of missing out on essential support. Programmes we fund will need to clearly demonstrate how they engage and support families from minoritised backgrounds. To this end, we are particularly interested to hear from organisations that have developed and tailored programmes for racially minoritised kinship families. We are committed to working flexibly and creatively to support smaller organisations, including ‘by and for’ providers who may not have engaged with us before.  

Supporting kinship carers and the children they care for, together   

Today’s call comes as kinship care rises to the top of the policy and political agenda. We know that Department for Education Ministers are committed to better support for kinship families because this is key to the drive to ensure opportunities for all children. National statutory guidance, issued by the DfE at the same time as the Practice Guide, aims to improve outcomes for children brought up in kinship care, by strengthening the support available for their carers. We also welcome the appointment of the new national Kinship Ambassador, Jahnine Davis, who is championing the voices and perspectives of children and racially minoritised families and working with local authorities to improve practice. 

Our funding call will support the national effort to give kinship care greater profile and priority, by identifying the existing gaps in the evidence on services for kinship families, and testing what kinds of support works best for them. Ultimately, it will tell us how we can make the biggest difference to the lives of children in kinship care. 

If you provide outstanding support to kinship families, we want to hear from you. Join us to find out what works to support kinship families and improve the life chances of children in kinship care.  

SHARE

Related News

Read our latest news and blogs

Blog

May 1, 2025

The Foundations Guidebook: A new tool to help more children and families get the right support

News

April 22, 2025

Coming soon: New, updated Foundations Guidebook

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.