A systematic review of interventions for children and young people displaying harmful sexual behaviour

A systematic review of interventions for children and young people displaying harmful sexual behaviour

Summary

These protocols summarise plans for a series of reviews on understanding how to support children and young people who display harmful sexual behaviours.

Who, what, why and how?

Child-on-child sexual abuse is commonly referred to as ‘harmful sexual behaviour’, defined as behaviour which is developmentally inappropriate, may be harmful towards self or others and/or be abusive towards another child, young person or adult. Harmful sexual behaviour exists within a continuum/spectrum, ranging from behaviours considered inappropriate to those more violent and harmful.

To date, less is known about what works for those at the ‘inappropriate’ end of the spectrum. There is, however, acknowledgement that these interventions should be holistic, whole-family, and child-focused. It is the aim of this systematic review to capture evidence at both ends of this spectrum.

We have commissioned the University of Central Lancashire, University of Birmingham, and Durham University to conduct a systematic review which aims to identify and describe:

  1. Interventions with strong evidence of improving outcomes for children and young people exhibiting inappropriate and/or harmful sexual behaviour
  2. The types of support available which can help improve these outcomes for children and young people. This includes components of intervention delivery and population characteristics which may influence effectiveness
  3. The enablers and barriers to successful implementation of interventions for children and young people who exhibit inappropriate and/or harmful sexual behaviour
  4. The views of intervention users and practitioners about the acceptability and usefulness of interventions.

The review will focus on children aged 0–18 years old who have undertaken an intervention designed to prevent harmful sexual behaviour from occurring. All included efficacy-based studies will be randomised controlled trials or quasi-experimental designs. Outcomes will include child mental health, child behaviour, recidivism, and a longer list of other outcomes.

Research Questions

  1. What works: Which interventions are effective in supporting and improving outcomes in children and young people exhibiting harmful sexual behaviour (and its spectrum)?
  2. For whom: What are the different types of interventions, how are they defined, and which models are effective for different populations of children and young people?
  3. How and why: What practice elements and intervention components are associated with successful interventions when supporting this population?
  4. Implementation: What are the enablers and barriers to successful implementation of interventions when children/young people exhibit harmful sexual behaviour?
  5. User perspectives and needs: What are the views of intervention users and practitioners about the acceptability and usefulness of interventions?

Delivery Partners

University of Central Lancashire, University of Birmingham, Durham University

Due Date

This project is due to be completed by June 2027.
SHARE

Realist review protocol

Download

Evidence and gap map protocol

Download

Systematic review protocol

Download

Related Projects

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.