This project or publication was produced before or during the merger of What Works for Children’s Social Care (WWCSC) and the Early Intervention Foundation (EIF).
This report, detailing the findings of a survey of nearly 2,000 registered social workers, highlights the toll racism is taking on social workers in England. Nearly one in five children and adult social workers who responded to the survey reported that workplace racism had increased their anxiety. Ten per cent had considered leaving their organisation as a result of racism, with 8% considering leaving social work entirely. The survey found that nearly one in ten social workers (9%) had experienced incidents of racism directed at them by colleagues and managers at least five times in the previous 12 months, while a similar number (9%) reported witnessing service users or families experiencing racism from colleagues or managers.
The findings from the survey, and the discussion groups convened in light of the survey, will help shape the Anti-Racist Steering Group’s forth-coming action plan to address racism within social work.
The project was developed by the Anti-Racist Steering Group, composed of representatives from the Adults and Children’s Principal Social Workers’ Network, the Department for Education, Social Work England, Ofice of the Chief Social Workers Department of Health and Social Care and What Works for Children’s Social Care. The Steering Group sought to gain a better understanding of the scale and nature of racism in social work and where examples of good anti-racist practice could be built upon, followed by a series of engagement events to reflect on the findings and plan next steps.
The survey was developed by the Anti-Racist Steering Group, who devised an initial set of questions, which we then refined by researchers from WWCSC to ensure they were phrased in a clear and valid way. The survey was a combination of multiple choice questions, which allow us to monitor the prevalence of racism and initiatives to address it, and text box responses which give more nuances about those experiences and initiatives. Survey participants were also invited to take part in a focus group discussion to review examples of good anti-racist practice.
The survey was live from 17 June to 11 August 2021 and received 1,958 responses, which is approximately 2% of all social workers. Of these, 457 indicated that they would be open to participating in a focus group discussion.
The analysis of the multiple-choice questions was quantitative and focused on the response frequencies and proportions of each choice from each question.
As there were a large number of text responses, we selected a sample of these for analysis. The responses were analysed using a thematic approach, identifying key themes in experiences of racism and strategies to further anti-racist practice.
Experiences of racism in the workplace
Reported impact of racism on self
Organisational mechanisms to address racism
Factors enabling colleagues to intervene
The survey found that racism in the social work profession is widespread and has a serious impact on the wellbeing, career progression and retention of Black and Minority Ethnic social workers. The findings indicate that efforts to address social workers’ experiences of racism should focus on racism from people who are receiving a service, as well as from colleagues and managers. Work to strengthen anti-racism in organisations needs to address issues highlighted in the survey, including increased scrutiny of Black and Minority Ethnic social workers’ performance, lack of career progression, and passive racism, in the form of microaggression and unconscious bias.
Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.
Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.
Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.
Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.
Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.
Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.
Click here for more information.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.
Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.
Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.
Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.
Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.
Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.
Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.
Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.
Click here for more information.