Parenting Through Adversity

Parents of children & young people 11 to 18

Key Principles: Local system culture

Key principles help to ensure that accessible, acceptable interventions for parents facing adversities can be effectively designed and implemented. They are drawn from quantitative and qualitative research, evaluations of implementation, and from common features of effective parenting interventions.

What?

  • Local areas that use evidence effectively, embrace innovation, and work collaboratively across partner agencies (such as health, education, and police) implement parenting support that is more sustainable and more likely to have an impact
  • Being system-ready for delivery means being open to evidence-based practice, flexible to adapt to local needs, strongly collaborative with partners, and committed to problem-solving and continual improvement
  • Using data and the voices and experiences of children, young people and families, as well as reflective feedback loops to help maintain programme fidelity while ensuring interventions remain relevant and responsive to changing community needs.

Why?

  • An evidence-informed and collaborative culture ensures that parenting support is both effective and tailored to the needs of the local population
  • Continuous learning and innovation allow services to adapt to emerging challenges
  • Strong multi-agency coordination prevents duplication and improves outcomes for families
  • Embedding reflection, feedback, and data-sharing strengthens accountability, supports informed commissioning decisions, and promotes long-term sustainability
  • When local systems align around shared goals and evidence-based approaches, the fidelity and impact of support delivered to families improve.

To translate this into practice:

Building a culture of evidence use, innovation, and collaboration across the local system.

  • Leaders should use evidence and data to inform commissioning and service design, establish information-sharing processes across partners, and create organisational cultures that value reflection, learning, and innovation
  • Practitioners and practice supervisors should champion evidence-based programmes, use supervision and data to reflect on progress, and problem-solve challenges collaboratively with families and multi-agency partners
  • Practitioners should collect and use feedback from families to understand engagement barriers, measure impact, and continually improve the delivery of support.

What?

  • Successful implementation of parenting support depends on effective collaboration across agencies, including health, education, the police, and other specialist agencies, such as youth justice, where necessary
  • When partnerships share values, use common language, and coordinate seamlessly, families experience smoother referrals, consistent support, and fewer handovers
  • Strong multi-agency systems reduce duplication, prevent conflicting messages, and help families avoid having to retell their stories
  • Collaboration also ensures that any risks (such as extra-familial harm) and needs outside the home are addressed through coordinated responses that go beyond parenting interventions alone.

Why?

  • Clear structures, shared accountability, and open communication between relevant agencies create the conditions for effective, family-centred support
  • Integrated working ensures families receive timely, appropriate help, improving outcomes and reducing service fragmentation
  • When roles and responsibilities are well defined, practitioners can focus on supporting families rather than navigating system barriers
  • Conversely, unclear roles and poor coordination can lead to inconsistent messages to families, disengagement, and a reduced impact of parenting interventions.

To translate this into practice:

Building strong, clearly defined multi-agency systems that promote seamless, family-centred collaboration.

  • Leaders should establish shared approaches and referral pathways across relevant agencies, coordinate parenting support with other therapeutic and community services (such as health) and create policies that enable clear communication and data sharing
  • Practitioners and practice supervisors should maintain close working relationships with professionals across the partnership, coordinate different forms of family support, and ensure families understand how services connect
  • Practitioners should use supervision to navigate any complex multi-agency situations and ensure referrals for additional or specialist support are made promptly and appropriately.

What?

  • A confident, knowledgeable, and well-supported workforce is essential to delivering effective parenting support
  • High workloads, staff turnover, and limited supervision can undermine service quality and consistency. Conversely, reflective supervision, manageable caseloads, and high-quality training strengthen staff confidence and the impact of interventions
  • Parents value practitioners who balance professionalism with warmth and approachability. Skilled and confident practitioners help parents trust the techniques being used and engage more effectively in support
  • Workforce consistency also ensures a seamless and stable family experience due to the time spent building high-quality relationships

Why?

  • A trained, supported, and supervised workforce can deliver higher-quality, evidence-based interventions and maintain fidelity to programme models to improve child and family outcomes
  • Reflective supervision enables staff to manage complex family dynamics and supports their wellbeing, reducing burnout and turnover
  • When leaders prioritise workforce development, staff feel valued and equipped, creating a culture of learning, innovation, and continuous improvement
  • A stable, supported workforce leads to better relationships with families and more sustainable, effective parenting support.

To translate this into practice:

Developing and sustaining a skilled, confident, and well-supported workforce.

  • Leaders should implement a clear workforce strategy aligned to the Children’s Social Care National Framework to ensure access to high-quality training and reflective supervision. They should protect time for professional development and promote manageable caseloads
  • Practitioners and practice supervisors should use supervision to reflect on practice, address workload challenges, and actively engage in training to build confidence and skills
  • Whole organisations should foster a culture of learning and stability, valuing practitioner wellbeing and consistency to ensure families receive reliable and effective support.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.