Parenting Through Adversity

Parents of children & young people 11 to 18

Key Principles: Working with families

Key principles help to ensure that accessible, acceptable interventions for parents facing adversity can be effectively designed and implemented. They are drawn from quantitative and qualitative research, evaluations of implementation, and from common features of effective parenting interventions.

What?

  • Parents’ engagement with parenting support depends heavily on the quality of their relationship with practitioners
  • When practitioners build trust through respect, empathy, and are anti-discriminatory, parents feel safe to express their emotions, which reduces shame and stigma. This helps them gain confidence in their parenting and strengthens communication with their children
  • In contrast, authoritative or judgmental approaches from practitioners can lead to feelings of criticism and discourage parents’ ongoing engagement.

Why?

  • Trusting and respectful relationships make parents feel valued and understood, encouraging them to participate fully and sustain their engagement
  • Support delivered in open and respectful ways reduces stigma, builds confidence, and improves outcomes for families – especially those facing structural challenges, such as poverty, discrimination, or housing difficulties.

When there is a lack of trust between parent and practitioner, engagement declines, and the impact of support is reduced.

To translate this into practice:

  • Build trust and collaboration at all levels of support
  • Leaders should create supportive systems that prioritise co-production, workforce training, and accessible, inclusive services to enable this
  • All practitioners should approach families with respect, curiosity, and a strengths-based mindset – recognising parents as experts on their own situation and avoiding stigma
  • Supervisors and practitioners should focus on consistent, transparent communication, empower parents to build confidence, and address structural barriers that may hinder engagement.

What?

  • Family dynamics can be complex and may at times be a barrier to engagement or completion of parenting support programmes
  • Practitioners who approach these dynamics with curiosity help families feel understood and supported
  • By exploring the reasons behind behaviours and identifying existing strengths within the family, practitioners build on what is working well and promote positive change
  • Trusted practitioners also provide a neutral, structured space where families reflect on their relationships, understand each other’s perspectives, and communicate more openly, leading to improved outcomes.

Why?

  • Curiosity and a systemic approach enable practitioners to see behaviours within the broader context of family relationships, vulnerabilities, and experiences
  • When families feel that their circumstances are understood and heard, trust and engagement improves
  • This approach helps strengthen parent–child relationships, supports emotional openness, and boosts parental confidence
  • Conversely, when family dynamics are misunderstood or approached with stigma, engagement can decline and opportunities for improvements in family functioning may be lost.

To translate this into practice:

Promoting curiosity, reflection, and an understanding of individuals’ situations in work with families.

  • Senior leaders should prioritise reflective supervision and manageable workloads to enable practitioners to engage meaningfully with complex family dynamics and provide training in strengths-based approaches
  • Practice supervisors and practitioners should approach family interactions with openness and curiosity, seeking to understand what behaviours reveal about family experiences and relationships
  • Practitioners should engage all family members, act as balanced mediators, and create safe spaces for open and honest communication.
  • Practitioners should focus on identifying and building on existing family strengths and resources, recognising and reinforcing what is already working well
  • Practitioners should adapt the timing, pace, and focus of support to suit a family’s circumstances, while managing safeguarding risks sensitively and collaboratively with other agencies as necessary.

What?

  • Parenting programmes can help parents build confidence in supporting their child or young person when faced with behaviours that challenge
  • This confidence often stems from a clearer understanding of how to set and maintain appropriate boundaries as well as respond calmly and consistently
  • It is particularly valuable for parents of young people, who may have previously felt disempowered or blamed when managing challenging behaviours
  • Group-based interventions can further strengthen confidence by helping parents reduce isolation and share experiences, recognising that change can take time
  • Where challenging behaviours may indicate risks outside the home or additional needs, further multi-agency support (such as with health, education or youth justice prevention) is essential.

Why?

  • When parents feel more confident and supported, they are better able to respond constructively to challenging behaviours, improving relationships and outcomes for both parent and child
  • Confidence enables parents to persevere with new strategies even when progress is slow, reducing stress and feelings of blame
  • Collaborative, multi-agency responses ensure that families receive the right level of support when behaviours may reflect wider risks such as extra-familial harm, trauma, or unmet needs.

To translate this into practice:

Building parents’ confidence through coordinated, strengths-based, and trauma-informed support.

  • Leaders should promote joined-up working across services, ensure clear referral pathways, and equip staff with training that combines behaviour management skills and a trauma-informed understanding of youth development
  • Practitioners should support parents to understand potential causes of challenging behaviour, set consistent boundaries, and recognise when wider multi-agency support beyond parenting support is needed
  • Practitioners should support parents to build on their strengths, track their progress, and stay motivated as change develops over time.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.