Access to timely and effective support is important for addressing the impact of domestic abuse on children and young people. However, access varies due to high demand and variability of existing services across the country-particularly for those not considered high risk of harm.
WeMatter is a digital, group-based support service developed to address this gap for children and young people aged 8–17 years old who have been affected by domestic abuse but are not currently experiencing harm or living with the perpetrator. It consists of eight weekly one-hour group sessions, delivered by two specialist WeMatter facilitators, with two one-to-one sessions.
WeMatter is delivered by Victim Support and uses the Domestic Abuse Recovery Toolkit developed by Rock Pool, the UK’s leading trauma-informed recovery service for those who have experienced or witnessed domestic abuse.
With funding from the Cabinet Office’s Evaluation Accelerator Fund, Foundations commissioned Verian to conduct the first independent pilot randomised controlled trial of WeMatter.
The main aims of the evaluation were:
A waitlist randomised controlled trial design was used for the study. Between April 2024 and June 2025, 312 children and young people took part in the pilot trial. Half joined WeMatter groups straight away; the other half were placed on a waiting list for a maximum of 14 weeks before joining their WeMatter group.
Verian conducted a pilot impact evaluation, and implementation and process evaluation, and an analysis of service costs.
The impact evaluation measured the effect of WeMatter on participants’ mental wellbeing (using the Stirling Children’s Wellbeing Scale) and older participants’ perceptions of social support (using the Social Support Scale).
The implementation and process evaluation involved interviews and focus groups with children, parents/carers, and staff to understand their experiences of WeMatter, how the service was delivered, and perceived impacts.
The pilot showed that WeMatter is promising and worth testing at scale. It demonstrated that a full trial is feasible with adjustments, and early findings suggest that the programme has the potential to improve children’s mental wellbeing.
Children and young people who took part in WeMatter reported a more positive emotional state and outlook compared to those on the waitlist who had not yet received the service. These outcomes align with the programme’s goals and suggest that its core mechanisms (peer support, trusted facilitators, and engaging content) worked well.
The difference we found was moderate in size, suggesting WeMatter may have a positive impact on mental wellbeing. However, because the study involved a small number of participants and some data was missing at follow-up, this result should be seen as an early indication of impact, rather than a precise estimate. To draw confident conclusions about WeMatter’s impact on children’s wellbeing, we need to run a larger trial with some design improvements.
WeMatter was delivered largely as planned, with sessions covering the intended content and activities. Challenges included staff turnover, digital access issues for some families, and difficulties running groups during school holidays, which meant some groups were smaller than intended or had different facilitators. More children and young people dropped out than we would have liked, which reduces the quality of follow-up data and the overall sample size.
Participants, parents, and facilitators consistently reported positive changes after participating in WeMatter. This included reports of improved understanding of healthy relationships, ability to manage emotions, stronger feelings of support, and overall improvements in wellbeing.
The average cost per participant randomised during the trial period was £1,054.73 (excluding the costs associated with the evaluation). The complexity of the trial, staff turnover (possibly linked to trial requirements), and the lower number of referrals especially in the first months of the trial meant that the cost per CYP randomised into the trial was higher than Victim Support’s original estimate of £500 per participant
The report outlines several recommendations that could help ensure a larger randomised trial of WeMatter can be delivered successfully:
You can view the project linked to this publication here:
Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.
Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.
Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.
Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.
Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.
Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.
Click here for more information.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.
Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.
Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.
Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.
Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.
Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.
Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.
Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.
Click here for more information.