No Wrong Door Model

Evaluation

No Wrong Door

Summary

These protocols summarise plans for evaluating the No Wrong Door model roll-out across four local authorities in England, building on a pilot evaluation of No Wrong Door in Middlesbrough published in 2021.

Who, what, why and how?

As part of the Department for Education’s (DfE) Strengthening Families, Protecting Children (SFPC) programme, we are evaluating the roll-out of the No Wrong Door model in four local authorities: Rochdale, Norfolk, Warrington, and Redcar and Cleveland. Leicester was a fifth local authority selected to take part in  the trial in 2020 but withdrew before implementation began and is therefore not included in the evaluations. Implementation started in Spring 2020.

Developed in North Yorkshire Council, No Wrong Door is an integrated service for children and young people aged 12 to 25 years old who are Looked After or are on the edge of care. No Wrong Door operates through a hub or outreach model and offers children and young people tailored support from a designated keyworker and a wide range of multi-disciplinary specialists.

The model aims to reduce the need for social care, improve stability, and strengthen children and young people’s outcomes by providing wraparound support adapted to their individual needs, rather than moving them between services to meet these needs.

This evaluation has three strands:

  1. An impact evaluation using a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Control Trial (SW-CRT) design. This means that local authorities begin delivering the model at different times, with all local authorities in the sample eventually implementing No Wrong Door
  2. Alongside the impact evaluation, we will conduct an Implementation and Process Evaluation (IPE) across the four local authorities, to understand delivery during the roll-out of the model
  3. We are also conducting additional analyses to overcome challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic on the trial and programme delivery. To do so, we added a supplementary Difference-in-Differences (DiD) quasi-experimental analysis to the current impact evaluation design.

The evaluation protocols developed during this project are also available on the Open Science Framework (OSF).

Research Questions

Impact evaluations

Both impact evaluations will assess one primary research question about care entry, and three secondary research questions about service-level outcomes that may be impacted by the delivery of No Wrong Door.

Primary research question: What is the impact of No Wrong Door on children’s likelihood of becoming Looked After within 18 months of a referral to children’s social care services?

Our secondary research questions will address the impact of No Wrong Door on:

  • The time that children and young people spend in care
  • Placement stability for children and young people who are in care
  • The likelihood of young people who are known to CSC services to be not in employment, education, or training (NEET).

Implementation and Process Evaluation (IPE)

The implementation and process evaluation will: assess how the model is delivered across the local authorities and identify any enablers and  barriers to delivery; and improve understanding of the model. Its research questions relate specifically to fidelity and adaptation, programme differentiation, reach and acceptability, and mechanisms and outcomes.

Delivery Partners

North Yorkshire Council

Due Date

This project is due to be completed by March 2028.
SHARE

Trial evalution Protocol: No wrong Door

Download

Difference-in-Differences (DiD) evaluation: No wrong Door

Download

Related Projects

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.