Second Step Early Learning

Second Step Early Learning is a classroom-based intervention for children between 4 and 5 years. The intervention is delivered by preschool teachers to classes of children in short daily sessions of five to seven minutes for 28 weeks, with the aim of improving children’s socio-emotional and memory, attention, and planning skills.

The information above is as offered/supported by the intervention provider.

Population characteristics as evaluated

4 to 5 years old

Level of need: Targeted-selected
Race and ethnicities: Anglo-American, African American, Hispanic, American Asian.

Model characteristics

Group

Setting: Children’s centre or early-years setting
Workforce: Preschool teacher
Evidence rating:
Cost rating:

Child outcomes:

  • Enhancing school achievement & employment
    • Improved self-regulatory behaviour

UK available

UK tested

Published: April 2025
Last reviewed: September 2021

Model description

Second Step Early Learning (SSEL) is a classroom-based intervention for children between 4 and 5 years. SSEL is a universal intervention, but has been targeted at disadvantaged areas in its best-evidenced implementation.

SSEL is delivered by preschool teachers to classes of children in short daily sessions of five to seven minutes for 28 weeks. Core social-emotional and self-regulation skills are taught with weekly themes covering content from five units: skills for learning, empathy, emotion management, friendship skills, and transition to school. The weekly themes are presented on large photo cards featuring the daily activities, which are designed to be integrated into the normal preschool day. As well as the brief lessons, SSEL incorporates theme-related songs and Brain Builder games, which involve attention, following directions, and inhibitory control, and are designed to be played daily and increase in complexity across the duration of the intervention. Teachers are also encouraged to reinforce the skills throughout the day with suggested teaching strategies.

Six weeks are spent covering skills for learning, including listening and asking for help; six weeks are spent covering empathy, including identifying feelings and demonstrating caring towards others; six weeks are spent covering emotion management, including identifying strong emotions and calming down; seven weeks are spent on friendship skills, including inviting others to play and techniques for calming down and solving problems; and three weeks are spent reviewing the skills taught in preparation for school transition.

Each week the theme is introduced using puppets on day 1; on day 2 a theme-related situation and how to solve it is discussed; days 3 and 4 involve either small or large group reinforcement activities; and on day 5 the class read a book related to the theme.

Age of child

4 to 5 years

Target population

Preschool children

Disclaimer: The information in this section is as offered/supported by the intervention provider.

Why?

Science-based assumption

Problem behaviours can have a negative impact on school outcomes.

Science-based assumption

Social-emotional competence and self-regulation can improve readiness to learn.

Who?

Science-based assumption

Preschool children, particularly from disadvantaged backgrounds.

How?

Intervention

Second Step Early Learning teaches skills that strengthen children’s ability to learn, have empathy, manage emotions, and solve problems.

What?

Short-term

Children have improved social-emotional competence.

Medium-term

Children have increased self-regulation.

Long-term

Children have increased school success, reduced aggression, and improved peer relations.

Who is eligible?

Preschool children aged 4 to 5 years.

How is it delivered?

Second Step Early Learning is delivered over 28 weeks of five- to seven-minute daily activities by one practitioner to classes of children.

What happens during the intervention?

SSEL is delivered by preschool teachers to classes of children in short daily sessions of five to seven minutes for 28 weeks, teaching core social-emotional skills using short activities, songs, games, and reinforcement throughout the day.

Who can deliver it?

The practitioner who delivers this intervention is a preschool teacher.

What are the training requirements?

The practitioners are provided with an online staff training toolkit, including a kick-off meeting agenda, four check-in meeting agendas, and a wrap-up meeting agenda. Booster training of practitioners is not required.

How are the practitioners supervised?

Supervision of practitioners is not required.

What are the systems for maintaining fidelity?

Intervention fidelity is maintained through the following processes:

  • Training manual
  • Face-to-face training
  • Fidelity monitoring.

Is there a licensing requirement?

No

Contact details*

Organisation: Committee for Children

Email address: info@cfchildren.org

Websites: http://www.secondstep.org/
http://www.cfchildren.org/

*Please note that this information may not be up to date. In this case, please visit the listed intervention website for up to date contact details.

The most rigorous evidence for Second Step Early Learning comes from a cluster RCT which was conducted in the United States.

This study identified statistically significant improvements consistent with Foundations’ Level 3 threshold in child memory, planning, and attention skills.

Second Step Early Learning can be described as evidence-based: it has evidence from at least one rigorously conducted RCT or QED demonstrating a statistically significant positive impact on at least one child outcome.

Child outcomes

Improved memory, planning, and attention skills

Improvement index

N/A

Interpretation

N/A

Study

1

Search and review

Identified in search1
Studies reviewed1
Meeting the L2 threshold0
Meeting the L3 threshold1
Contributing to the L4 threshold0
Ineligible0

Study 1

Study designCluster RCT
CountryUnited States
Sample characteristics

770 4-year-old children from seven community and six Head Start preschools

Race, ethnicities, and nationalities
  • 42.3% Anglo-American
  • 40.6% Hispanic American •
  • 26.0% African American
  • 2.1% Asian American.
Population risk factors
  • 71.6% of parents were not married
  • 53.7% of families had family incomes <$20,000.
Timing
  • Baseline
  • Post-intervention
Child outcomes

Improved attention, memory, and planning skills (Child report)

Other outcomes

None

Study rating3
Citations

Upshur, C. C., Wenz-Gross, M., Rhoads, C., Heyman, M., Yoo, Y. & Sawosik, G. (2019) A randomized efficacy trial of the second step early learning (SSEL) curriculum. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 62, 145–159.

Upshur, C. C., Heyman, M. & Wenz-Gross, M. (2017) Efficacy trial of the second step early learning (SSEL) curriculum: Preliminary outcomes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 50, 15–25. (preliminary report)

No other studies were identified for this intervention.

Note on provider involvement: This provider has agreed to Foundations’ terms of reference (or the Early Intervention Foundation's terms of reference), and the assessment has been conducted and published with the full cooperation of the intervention provider.

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.