Keeping children out of care: In conversation about where next for Family Group Conferences

Chief Executive

Keeping children out of care: In conversation about where next for Family Group Conferences

This week, we welcomed colleagues from across the sector to an event exploring the next steps in ensuring that all families can access a high-quality Family Group Conference at pre-proceedings. In this blog, our Chief Executive Dr Jo Casebourne shares her reflections on the event.

We now have compelling evidence that Family Group Conferences (FGCs) are able to keep children out of care and living safely at home with their families, and this week we were delighted to bring together key voices in the sector to start a vital conversation about how we can support local areas to offer high-quality FGCs to all families at pre-proceedings. Foundations was joined by David Johnston MP, Minister for Children, Families and Wellbeing, Isabelle Trowler, Chief Social Worker for Children & Families, Alex Ryan, FGC Service Manager at Gloucestershire County Council, Tim Aldridge, Executive Director of Children and Learning at Camden Council, and Lucy Butler, Director of Children, Young People and Learning at West Sussex County Council.

In July, we published findings from our landmark study showing that the use of FGCs at pre-proceeding stage can keep children out of care, and safely with their families. The randomised controlled trial (RCT) shows that children whose families were referred for FGCs were significantly less likely to go into care – just over a third of children (36.2%) whose families were referred to an FGC were taken into care, compared to nearly half (44.8%) of children who were not referred. Our findings suggest that if FGCs were consistently available at pre-proceedings, over 2,000 more children could remain safely with their families each year, and over £150 million could be saved within the first two years.

FGCs are used widely across England, but we know there is a huge variation in the extent to which they are delivered and too many families are not able to access them. We have been told of differences in the hundreds between how many FGCs are run in different local authorities and many FGC services have been scaled back due to funding and other challenges. We want to see families receiving an excellent family group conference in all 153 local areas across the country, and our event was a key step in working out how we can make that happen.

We also know that FGCs are not being delivered consistently. Despite the best intentions of local authorities, some families receive a poor quality, or rushed, conference that doesn’t meet the standards needed to ensure the best possible chance of positive outcomes for children and families. Through conversations at this week’s event, we were able to think in greater detail about questions of ensuring consistency and model fidelity in relation to FGCs, drawing on the depth of expertise in the room.  

A particular focus for the panel was the importance of ensuring that children are at the heart of what we do in this area. Our conversations identified a need to ensure that both the language we use is sensitive to the lived experience of children and families, and that the services provided work for all children. It was clear that more needs to be done to identify the specific needs of families, particularly considering the challenges faced by those from minoritised ethnic backgrounds. There is a clear lack of evidence around the experiences of minoritised ethnic groups in relation to FGCs and it was great to hear from a delegate who was currently carrying out research on this exact issue. At Foundations, we are committed to addressing these gaps in the evidence base and improving our understanding of what works for all vulnerable children.

We are working with Department for Education and others to ensure we act on our study and help children stay out of care and with their families. Minister Johnston confirmed the government’s commitment to helping achieve this goal in his speech on Tuesday evening, describing increased use of FGCs as an important part of the Department’s plans. We were encouraged by the quality of the debate, critical discussion of key issues, and by the shared commitment in the room to supporting all local areas to offer high-quality FGCs at pre-proceedings.

We know there are different views about evaluation in our sector, but the FGC study has demonstrated that impact evaluation, and specifically RCTs, can help us find the best way to support vulnerable children and their families. Finding out what works is only the start and the event this week demonstrated that there is an open door to working with partners in Government and the sector to ensure that these findings turn into real-world change.

SHARE

Related News

Read our latest news and blogs

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.