This project or publication was produced before or during the merger of What Works for Children’s Social Care (WWCSC) and the Early Intervention Foundation (EIF).
This exploratory study aimed to better understand the services that local authorities (LAs) provide to care leavers to support their emotional wellbeing.
This exploratory study aimed to better understand the services that local authorities (LAs) provide to care leavers to support their emotional wellbeing. An evidence review and in-depth qualitative work with five English LAs were carried out to explore care leavers’ emotional wellbeing needs, the services available to them, and barriers and facilitators to accessing these services. Results showed that support offered across LAs is highly varied, and limited research has been conducted to understand the impact of services. Holistic support was preferred by care leavers as it accounted for a broad range of needs. There were a range of common practical barriers to being able to access support.
Young people leaving care go through a significant period of change in their lives as they transition into adulthood and out of children’s services. Research shows that care leavers experience worse wellbeing outcomes than their non-care experienced peers, particularly in terms of mental health and markers of wider emotional wellbeing, such as isolation. Although LAs are required to provide practical and wellbeing support to care leavers (often primarily through an allocated Personal Advisor), there is limited statutory guidance on what emotional wellbeing support should be provided. Additionally, little is known about what emotional wellbeing support is offered by individual LAs across England; this exploratory study was designed to better understand provision and best practice.
Three strands of work were carried out as part of the project:
We conducted 46 interviews with care leavers and staff as part of the qualitative study, with a thematic analysis conducted on generated data. Peer researchers, supported by the McPin Foundation, carried out interviews with care leavers, and contributed to data analysis. These results were triangulated with the findings from the evidence review and discussed with 25 deliberative workshop participants, who validated findings and generated recommendations for policy and practice.
The results of this study suggest that LAs should take a dual approach to supporting wellbeing, focusing on both emotional wellbeing and practical support; this would enable LAs to meet both the basic needs and emotional wellbeing needs of care leavers. The findings of the study also suggest that LAs should seek to improve the consistency and diversity of their support offer, and statutory guidance or other government-level support should be provided to help LAs do so. The capacity of PAs could be increased, both in terms of caseloads and training, so that they have more time to work with care leavers individually and have appropriate training and support to meet mental health needs.
More work should be done to evaluate emotional wellbeing services for care leavers, and to routinely monitor care leaver’s emotional wellbeing to understand the most effective ways to offer support.
Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.
Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.
Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.
Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.
Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.
Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.
Click here for more information.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.
Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.
Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.
Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.
Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.
Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.
Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.
Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.
Click here for more information.