In late 2024, the Department for Education (DfE) published the Command Paper: ‘Keeping Children Safe, Helping Families Thrive’, in which they outlined their intention to mandate an offer of family group decision making (FGDM) at the pre-proceedings stage in every local authority area. FGDM is an umbrella term to describe family-led meetings that allow a family network to come together and make a plan in response to concerns about a child’s safety and wellbeing. Family Group Conferences (FGCs) are a specific model of FGDM, in which a family network is supported by an independent coordinator to make decisions on how best to care for a child.
Our evidence has shown that when conducted at the pre-proceedings stage, Family Group Conferences (FGCs) are an effective way of safely keeping children out of public care and with their families. However, not all children at risk of going into care are offered an FGC, and variation in how FGCs are delivered in the UK impacts the reach, quality and equity of the service received by families. Many local authorities are already active champions of FGCs, but we need to go further if we are to prioritise family networks as a way of keeping children safe, over local authority care.
This briefing sets out advice for leaders of local children’s services on scaling up the impact of FGCs for the most vulnerable children. The briefing draws on recent evidence, best practice examples, and insights from local authority case studies across the country, underlining the importance of following the evidence on family decision-making to improve outcomes for children and young people.
To understand how senior leaders support greater access to FGCs as a way of keeping children out of care and with their families at the pre-proceedings stage, interviews were held with directors of children’s services, senior strategic leads and local elected members for children’s services in 12 local authorities. Similar conversations were also held with representatives from the Local Government Association (LGA) as well as the Association of Directors of Children’s Services (ADCS). We also worked closely with Family Rights Group to produce the briefing and identify case studies from across the country.
The briefing aims to help local leaders realise the potential of FGCs in their area, helping more children stay out of care and with their families where it is safe to do so. The work aimed to build understanding of the factors leaders considered to be most likely to increase uptake of FGCs, what influences leaders when it comes to decisions about investment in FGCs, and the information that leaders use to help them to build a case for the intervention locally.
This briefing sets out advice for leaders of local children’s services on scaling up the impact of FGCs for the most vulnerable children.
The briefing includes reflections from conversations with local leaders, the ADCS and LGA, which found that local leaders are already active champions for FGCs, but that local authorities and partnerships need to go further if they are to prioritise keeping children and young people with their family networks over local authority care.
To help local leaders realise the potential of FGCs, we have set out five local actions:
Sign up to receive our newsletter for the latest news, events and research from from Foundations
You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information on how we process your personal data please review our privacy policy.
Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.
Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.
Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.
Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.
Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.
Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.
Click here for more information.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.
Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.
Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.
Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.
Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.
Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.
Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.
Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.
Click here for more information.