Reducing parental conflict: A practical evaluation guide for local areas

Legacy Content

This project or publication was produced before or during the merger of What Works for Children’s Social Care (WWCSC) and the Early Intervention Foundation (EIF).

This guide is a practical tool to support your local area to evaluate activities aimed at reducing the impact of conflict between parents on children.

Evaluation matters. It is important to know whether interventions to support parents in conflict are beneficial for the children and families who need them most. 

Yet we know from our work with local areas, which has heavily informed this guide, that evaluation methods often feel daunting and that those commissioning or delivering RPC interventions are often uncertain about how to evaluate them. 

This guide aims to address this by breaking down the process of evaluating your local RPC interventions into a series of achievable tasks, to demonstrate whether there have been changes to your intended outcomes and whether your intervention is being implemented as intended.

This guide was updated in March 2023, based on our ongoing work with local areas to support their evaluation activities.

Who is the guide for?

The guide is written for public-sector commissioners, managers and leaders responsible for local activities to support healthy relationships and reduce parental conflict. However, you do not need to be an expert in conflict between parents to use this guide, or an expert in evaluation. 

How to use this guide

The guide is designed to be intuitive, interactive and as comprehensible as possible. It is structured as four modules, taking you through a series of manageable tasks. 

The guide does not go beyond guidance on conducting a pilot for outcomes, as in our work with local areas we have found that most are not progressing beyond this step with their RPC evaluation. For evaluation beyond piloting for outcomes, see our comprehensive guide, 10 steps for evaluation success.

Incorporated into the guide is a range of templates and downloadable examples of important documents and tools, as well as explanatory helpers on key concepts, practical tips for all stages of the process, and practice examples from three local areas, based on our experience working with real places across England.

Logic Model Template

Download

Theory of Change Template

Download

Looking to speak to us about something?

Contact Foundations

Related TOols

March 17, 2025

This resource explores the role of police professionals in responding to parental conflict and how their involvement can help mitigate its negative effects on children and families. Drawing on police perspectives from our exploratory project commissioned by DWP, it highlights practical approaches to identification, response, and collaboration with other services.

Keep Up to Date

Sign up to receive our newsletter for the latest news, events and research from from Foundations

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information on how we process your personal data please review our privacy policy.

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.