Extended definitions

Parenting Through Adversity Practice Guide (0–10)

Definition: Parenting programmes

A parenting intervention is defined for the purposes of this Practice Guide as a structured set of activities or services with set eligibility requirements, aimed at improving how parents and caregivers approach and ‘do’ their role, specifically their parenting knowledge, attitudes, skills, behaviours and practices (based on World Health Organization, 2022). Parenting programmes cover advice, guidance and training to support parents’ capacity to meet their child’s developmental needs, including on child health and physical development, children’s social and emotional needs, effective child discipline, and methods for supporting children’s play and learning

Most evidence-based parenting programmes are grounded in relationship perspectives and social learning theory. Within the context of children’s social care, parenting support also encompasses family work aimed at stopping abusive and neglectful parenting behaviours, as well as strengthening parent-child relationships, and supporting parents to engage with their child in positive ways. The parenting component may be combined with other content (e.g., parent relationship or life skills), types of support, types of therapy (e.g., cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)), forms of family-based therapy (e.g., multisystemic therapies), or child-focused interventions.

Family support programmes with parenting as an aspect are included in scope, such as home visiting programmes in which parents are seen in their own home and provided with information, support and/or training regarding child health, development, and care. Although interventions with a flexible structure are included, completely unstructured interventions are not included, for instance home visits not offered in a structured format, or therapies that do not have a structured approach. Parenting interventions of all durations are included, including one-off sessions.

This guide does not cover interventions such as specialist mental health support for parents experiencing mental health problems, nor specialist support to parents on needs such as substance misuse. Parenting interventions should be part of a wider system of support nationally and locally for the multiple and complex needs that families face.

Definition: Parents experiencing adversity

We define parents experiencing adversity as synonymous with those who face multiple and complex needs. Our definition of the families in scope for the systematic reviews was broad. Studies included in our reviews met the following criteria in terms of the parents they included:

  1. Parents of a child or children with a mean age of up to 10 years (including the prenatal period).
  2. Parents were either:
    • referred by agencies to receive an intervention based on their levels of maltreatment (treated)
    • were offered an intervention based on scoring highly on child maltreatment instruments
      (targeted indicated)
    • offered an intervention due to experiencing selected risk factors for maltreatment
      (targeted selected). These risk factors may apply to the individual, the family, or be interpersonal in nature, as set out in point 3 below.
  3. With selective studies, parents experienced one or multiple risk factors below, which are associated with an increased risk of child maltreatment:
    • Parental substance abuse
    • Parental incarceration
    • Parental mental health
    • Parental intellectual disability
    • Current or past experience of intimate partner violence
    • Parental childhood experience of maltreatment or other adverse childhood experiences
    • Children with severe child socio-emotional and conduct problems
    • Highly deprived socio-economic status
    • Teenage / adolescent parenthood
    • Traveller, refugee, asylum seeking or undocumented migrant status.

Want to join our team?

See our current vacancies

Keep Up to Date

Sign up to receive our newsletter for the latest news, events and research from from Foundations

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information on how we process your personal data please review our privacy policy.

Cost ratings:

This rating is based on information that programme providers have supplied about the components and requirements of their programme. Based on this information, EIF rates programmes on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates the least resource-intensive programmes and 5 the most resource-intensive. 

1: A rating of 1 indicates that a programmes has a low cost to set up and deliver, compared with other interventions reviewed by EIF. This is equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

2: A rating of 2 indicates that a programme has a medium-low cost to set up and deliver, compared with other interventions reviewed by EIF. This is equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

3: A rating of 3 indicates that a programme has a medium cost to set up and deliver, compared with other interventions reviewed by EIF. This is equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

4: A rating of 4 indicates that a programme has a medium-high cost to set up and deliver, compared with other interventions reviewed by EIF. This is equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

5: A rating of 5 indicates that a programme has a high cost to set up and deliver, compared with other interventions reviewed by EIF. This is equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

The evidence ratings distinguish five levels of strength of evidence. This is not a rating of the scale of impact but of the degree to which a programme has been shown to have a positive, causal impact on specific child outcomes.

Level 2: Recognises programmes with preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome, but where an assumption of causal impact cannot be drawn.

Level 2+: The programme will have observed a significant positive child outcome in an evaluation meeting all of the criteria for a level 2 evaluation, but also involving a treatment and comparison group. There is baseline equivalence between the treatment and comparison‐group participants on key demographic variables of interest to the study and baseline measures of outcomes (when feasible).

Level 3: Recognises programmes with evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous evaluation – that is, where a judgment about causality can be made.

Level 3+: The programme will have obtained evidence of a significant positive child outcome through an efficacy study, but may also have additional consistent positive evidence from other evaluations (occurring under ideal circumstances or real world settings) that do not meet this criteria, thus keeping it from receiving an assessment of 4 or higher.

Level 4: Recognises programmes with evidence of a long-term positive impact through multiple rigorous evaluations. At least one of these studies must have evidence of improving a child outcome lasting a year or longer.