4Rs and 2Ss

4Rs and 2Ss is a therapeutic intervention for families living in disadvantaged communities with a 7- to 11-year-old child diagnosed with oppositional defiant disorder or a conduct disorder. It is delivered by two practitioners and a family peer advocate to groups of six to eight families through 16 one-hour sessions.

The information above is as offered/supported by the intervention provider.

Population characteristics as evaluated

7 to 11 years old

Level of need: Targeted-indicated
Race and ethnicities: Asian/Pacific Islander, Black/African AmericanHispanic/Latino, Native American, White.

Model characteristics

Group

Setting: Outpatient setting, Community centre, School.
Workforce: Two mental health professionals and a family advocate
Evidence rating:
Cost rating:

Child outcomes:

  • Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour
    • Improved behaviour
  • Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing
    • Improved social behaviour

UK available

UK tested

Published: April 2025
Last reviewed: February 2023

Model description

4Rs and 2Ss is a therapeutic intervention for families living in disadvantaged communities with 7- to 11-year-old child diagnosed with oppositional defiant disorder or a conduct disorder.

4Rs and 2Ss is delivered by two practitioners and a family peer advocate to groups of six to eight families through 16 one-hour sessions. Parents and children attend the sessions together.

The intervention emphasises 4 Rs and 2 Ss. The 4 Rs are:

  • Rules. Rules organise the family. They also organise a child’s life in other areas like school, in the community, etc. Parents establish the rules and set up systems for knowing when they are and are not being followed. Rules should have a consequence if broken and a reward if followed. Consequences and rewards must be applied consistently and in a timely manner.
  • Responsibilities. Children and parents have differing responsibilities within the family system. This means that each member contributes to family success and also takes responsibility for problems when they occur.
  • Relationships. Relationships represent how family members care about each other. Children are more likely to thrive when family relationships are positive.
  • Respectful Communication. Good communication provides the foundation for positive family relationships. Communication is essential for parents to understand what their children are doing and feeling and help children feel supported by their parents.

The two Ss are:

  • Stress. Stress is something that happens to all family members. Stress can come from sources within or outside of the family system. A child’s behaviour can look exaggerated when seen by a parent who is under a lot of stress, and a parent’s stress can negatively impact the child.
  • Support. When family members experience stress, additional support is sometimes required to help them cope. Both parents and children need positive, responsible sources of support. Sources of support may include family members, friends, church, school, mental health professionals, and other community resources.

Each session is organised around the following activities:

  • A family social – during which participants check-in with the facilitators and each other while having refreshments or engaging in more structured activities.
  • Review roadwork – refers to assignments given to the families between sessions. Each week, participants discuss their roadwork and problem-solve with each other.
  • Let’s talk & let’s share – facilitators introduce a new topic for families to discuss and share ideas and experiences.
  • Let’s practise – encourages families to practise ideas and receive feedback from the group and facilitators.
  • This week’s roadwork – introduces a task or assignment for family members to try during the following week.

Age of child

7 to 11 years

Target population

Families with a child aged 7 to 11 years who has been diagnosed with oppositional defiant disorder or conduct disorder

Disclaimer: The information in this section is as offered/supported by the intervention provider.

Why?

Science-based assumption

Oppositional behaviour during primary school interferes with school achievement and increases the risk of behavioural problems becoming more serious in adolescence.

Science-based assumption

Effective parenting practices and positive relationships between family members reduces the likelihood of oppositional behaviour persisting.

Who?

Science-based assumption

High levels of family stress and disadvantage can interfere with effective parenting practices and positive family relationships.

How?

Intervention

Group-based activities reduce the stigma associated with child behavioural problems and provide parents with opportunities to learn from each other.

Parents learn and share effective strategies for improving:

Children’s behaviour

Family communication

Family relationships.

What?

Short-term

Parents experience less stigma and are more motivated to attend parenting support

Family relationships improve

Parents experience less stress

Families find greater support within their community.

Medium-term

Children’s behaviour improves

Children are more engaged with school.

Long-term

Children are at less risk of behavioural and mental health problems in adolescence

Children engage positively with others

Children have greater success at school.

Who is eligible?

Families with a child aged 7 to 11 years who has been diagnosed with oppositional defiant disorder or conduct disorder.

How is it delivered?

4Rs and 2Ss is delivered in 16 one-hour sessions by two practitioners and a peer advocate to groups of six to eight families.

What happens during the intervention?

During each session, families participate in conversations about an R (Rules, Relationships, Responsibilities, Respectful Communication) or S (Stress or Support).

Families then reflect, practise a skill associated with the R or S of the day, and discuss how to practise it during the week outside of the group.

Who can deliver it?

The two practitioners who deliver this intervention are a Social Worker or Mental Health Counsellor and one Family Peer Advocate or Family Advocate.

What are the training requirements?

The practitioners have 5.5 hours of intervention training. Booster training of practitioners is not required.

How are the practitioners supervised?

It is recommended that practitioners are supervised by one clinical supervisor (qualified to QCF-7/8 level) with 5.5 hours of intervention training.

What are the systems for maintaining fidelity?

Intervention fidelity is maintained through the following processes:

  • Training manual
  • Other printed material
  • Other online material
  • Fidelity monitoring
  • Virtual training and online learning modules.

Is there a licensing requirement?

No

Contact details*

Contact person: Kara M. Dean-Assael
Organisation: NYU McSilver Institute for Poverty Policy and Research
Email address: kara.dean@nyu.edu
Website: https://mcsilver.nyu.edu/4rs-2ss/

*Please note that this information may not be up to date. In this case, please visit the listed intervention website for up to date contact details.

The most rigorous evidence for 4Rs and 2Ss comes from one comparison group study conducted in the United States consistent with Foundations’ Level 2 evidence.

This study identified statistically significant reductions in oppositional defiant behaviours, improved social skills, and reduced impairment with playmates, as well as a reduced need for additional services in comparison to children not receiving the intervention. 4Rs and 2Ss parents also reported significant reductions in stress.

4Rs and 2Ss has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome, but we cannot be confident that the intervention caused the improvement.

Search and review

Identified in search16
Studies reviewed1
Meeting the L2 thresholdN/A
Meeting the L3 threshold0
Contributing to the L4 threshold0
Ineligible15

Study 1

Study designQED
CountryUnited States
Sample characteristics

320 children aged between 7 and 11 years with a diagnosis of either Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) or Conduct Disorder from outpatient clinics in underserved communities

Race, ethnicities, and nationalities
  • Black/African American: 29% (4Rs 2Ss group), 30% (SAU)
  • Hispanic/Latino: 50% (4Rs 2Ss group), 46% (SAU)
  • White: 7% 4Rs 2Ss (group), 9% (SAU)
  • Other ethnicities include Native American, Asian/Pacific Islander.
Population risk factors
  • Children had a diagnosis of either Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) or Conduct Disorder
  • Participants were from outpatient clinics in underserved communities.
Timing
  • Baseline – studies 1a,b,c,d
  • Mid-intervention (2 months) – study 1a
  • Post-intervention (4 months) – studies 1a,b,c,d
  • Follow-up (6-months) – studies 1a,b,c,d.
Child outcomes

Post-intervention

  • Reduced oppositional/defiant behaviours
  • Improved social skills.

Six-month follow-up

  • Reduced oppositional/defiant behaviours
  • Reduced impairment with playmates.
Other outcomes

Reduced parental stress

Study rating2
Citations

Study 1a: Chacko, A., Gopalan, G., Franco, L., Dean-Assael, K., Jackson, J., Marcus, S., Hoagwood, K. & McKay, M. (2015) Multiple family group service model for children with disruptive behavior disorders: Child outcomes at post-treatment. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 23 (2), 67–77.

Study 1b: Gopalan, G., Chacko, A., Franco, L., Dean-Assael, K., Rotko, L., Marcus, S., Hoagwood, K. & McKay, M. (2015) Multiple family groups for children with disruptive behavior disorders: Child outcomes at 6-month follow-up. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 24 (9), 2721–2733.

Study 1c: McKay, M., Gopalan, G., Franco, L., Dean-Assael, K., Chacko, A., Jackson, J. & Fuss, A. (2011) A collaboratively designed child mental health service model: Multiple family groups for urban children with conduct difficulties. Research on Social Work Practice. 21 (6), 664–674.

Study 1d: Small, L., Jackson, J., Gopalan, G. & McKay, M. (2015) Meeting the complex needs of urban youth and their families through the 4Rs 2Ss Family Strengthening Program: The ‘real world’ meets evidence-informed care. Research on Social Work Practice. 25 (4), 433–445.

No further studies were identified for 4Rs and 2Ss.

Note on provider involvement: This provider has agreed to Foundations’ terms of reference (or the Early Intervention Foundation's terms of reference), and the assessment has been conducted and published with the full cooperation of the intervention provider.

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.