Helping the Noncompliant Child

Helping the Noncompliant Child (HNC; also known as the Parent Child Game) is a parenting intervention for parents who have concerns about the behaviour of a child between 3 and 5 years old. It is delivered by therapists to the parent and their child on a weekly or twice-weekly basis for a period of five to 12 weeks, depending on the family’s needs. Parents learn strategies for encouraging positive parent–child interaction and managing challenging child behaviour.

The information above is as offered/supported by the intervention provider.

Population characteristics as evaluated

3 to 5 years old

Level of need: Targeted-indicated
Race and ethnicities: African American, Asian, Hispanic , White.

Model characteristics

Individual

Setting: Out-patient, Home.
Workforce: Psychologists, social workers or counsellors.
Evidence rating:
Cost rating:

Child outcomes:

  • Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour
    • Improved behaviour
    • Reduced hyperactivity

UK available

UK tested

Published: April 2025
Last reviewed: July 2016

Model description

Helping the Noncompliant Child (HNC; also known as the Parent Child Game) is for parents who are having difficulties managing the behaviour of a child between the ages of 3 and 8 years.

It is delivered by a single therapist to the parent and their child on a weekly or twice weekly basis for a period of five to 12 weeks, depending on the parent and child’s needs.

HNC is delivered in two phases:

  • Phase 1. Parents learn how to follow the child’s lead and encourage positive behaviour through rewards (including praise and hugs).
  • Phase 2. Parents learn strategies for providing simple directions, getting their child’s attention, setting limits and using age-appropriate discipline for discouraging unwanted child behaviour.

Parent learning is supported through practitioner modelling, role-play, home-work assignments, and instruction.

Age of child

3 to 8 years old

Target population

Families with a child identified as having behavioural problems of symptoms associated with ADHD.

Disclaimer: The information in this section is as offered/supported by the intervention provider.

Why?

Science-based assumption

Young children naturally behave in challenging and non-compliant ways

Challenging child behaviours during preschool and primary school increase the risk of more serious behavioural problems occurring in adolescence.

Science-based assumption

Effective parenting behaviours can help children better regulate their own behaviour and reduce the risk of behavioural problems persisting

Ineffective parenting strategies can increase the risk of child behavioural problems persisting.

Who?

Science-based assumption

Parents experiencing difficulties with the behaviour of a child, including a child diagnosed with ADHD, frequently benefit from further support.

How?

Intervention

Parents learn how to:

Promote positive parent–child interaction through non-directive play

Reinforce positive child behaviour through praise and rewards

Discourage challenging child behaviour through age-appropriate discipline.

What?

Short-term

Parents implement effective parenting strategies in the home

Parents’ confidence increases

Parental stress reduces

Parent–child interaction improves.

Medium-term

Children’s self-regulatory capabilities and behaviour improves.

Long-term

Children are at less risk of antisocial behaviour in adolescence

Children are more compliant and better able to engage positively with others.

Who is eligible?

Parents who are having difficulties managing the behaviour of a child between the ages of 3 and 8 years old.

How is it delivered?

HNC is delivered in up to 12 sessions of approximately one hour.

What happens during the intervention?

  • HNC provides parents with a repertoire of effective strategies for managing non-compliant child behaviour.
  • Sessions take the form of learning specific skills through practice and practitioner feedback.
  • The child participates in all treatment sessions.
  • Parents also complete homework exercises and monitoring sheets to track their progress through the intervention.

Who can deliver it?

The practitioner who delivers this intervention is typically a psychologist, counsellor, or social worker.

What are the training requirements?

The practitioners have 32 hours of intervention training. Booster training of practitioners is not required.

How are the practitioners supervised?

It is recommended that practitioners are supervised by two host-agency supervisors with 32 hours of intervention training. It is also recommended that practitioners are supervised by one intervention developer supervisor.

What are the systems for maintaining fidelity?

Intervention fidelity is maintained through the following processes:

  • Telephone consultations
  • On-site supervision
  • Fidelity checklists
  • Ongoing consultations.

If practitioners are having difficulty delivering the intervention, an HNC consultant provides on-site booster sessions until proficient.

Is there a licensing requirement?

No

Contact details*

Contact person: Deborah J. Jones

Organisation: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Email address: djjones@email.unc.edu

*Please note that this information may not be up to date. In this case, please visit the listed intervention website for up to date contact details.

HNC’s most rigorous evidence comes from a single RCT conducted in the United States, consistent with Foundations’ Level 3 evidence strength criteria.

This study identified statistically significant reductions in parent reports of their child’s symptoms of ADHD, defiant child behaviour, physical aggression, and inattention and hyperactivity in comparison to the reports of parents not receiving the intervention.

HNC can be described as evidence-based: it has evidence from at least one rigorously conducted RCT or QED demonstrating a statistically significant positive impact on at least one child outcome.

Child outcomes

Reduced symptoms of ADHD

Immediately after the intervention

Improvement index

+49

Interpretation

5.93-point improvement on the ADHD Rating Scale-IV.

Study

1

Reduced defiant symptoms

Immediately after the intervention

Improvement index

+25

Interpretation

0.35-point improvement on the New York Parent Rating Scale.

Study

1

Reduced physical aggression

Immediately after the intervention

Improvement index

+14

Interpretation

0.24-point improvement on the New York Parent Rating Scales.

Study

1

Reduced inattention and hyperactivity

Immediately after the intervention

Improvement index

+39

Interpretation

13.82-point improvement on the Conners Parent Rating Scale.

Study

1

Search and review

Identified in search3
Studies reviewed3
Meeting the L2 threshold0
Meeting the L3 threshold1
Contributing to the L4 threshold0
Ineligible2

Study 1

Study designRCT
CountryUSA
Sample characteristics

164 children between ages 3 and 5 living in New York City; 74% of the children met the diagnostic criteria for ADHD

Race, ethnicities, and nationalities
  • 69% White
  • 25.6% Hispanic
  • 16% African American
  • 8% Asian
  • 5% Other.
Population risk factors

None reported with the exception of the ADHD diagnosis

Timing
  • Baseline
  • Post-intervention
  • 1-year follow-up (intervention groups only)
Child outcomes
  • Reduced ADHD symptoms (Parent report)
  • Reduced inattention (Parent report)
  • Reduced hyperactivity (Parent report)
  • Reduced ADHD symptoms (Clinician report)
  • Reduced inattention (Clinician report)
  • Reduced hyperactivity (Clinician report)
  • Reduced defiance (Parent report).
Other outcomes
  • Reduced parental stress (Parent report)
  • Improved parenting practices (Parent report)
  • Improved parenting behaviours (Researcher observation).
Study rating3
Citations

Abikoff, H. B., Thompson, M., Laver-Bradbury, C., Long, N., Forehand, R. L., Miller Brotman, L., Klein, R. G., Reiss, P., Huo, L. & Sonuga-Barke, E., (2015) Parent training for preschool ADHD: A randomized controlled trial of specialized and generic programs. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 56, 618–631.

The following studies were identified for this intervention but did not count towards the intervention’s overall evidence rating. An intervention receives the same rating as its most robust study or studies.

Forehand, R. L., Merchant, M. J., Parent, J., Long, N., Linnea, K. & Baer, J. (2011) An examination of a group curriculum for parents of young children with disruptive behaviour. Behaviour Modification. 35, 235–251. This reference refers to a randomised control trial, conducted in the USA.

Wells, K. C. & Egan, J. (1988) Social learning and systems family therapy for childhood oppositional disorder: Comparative treatment outcome. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 29, 138–146. This reference refers to a randomised control trial, conducted in the USA.

Note on provider involvement: This provider has agreed to Foundations’ terms of reference (or the Early Intervention Foundation's terms of reference), and the assessment has been conducted and published with the full cooperation of the intervention provider.

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.