MindUP 8-11

MindUP 8-11 is a schools-based social and emotional curriculum for children between 8 and 11 years old. It is delivered by teachers to groups of children over 12 sessions of 40 to 50 minutes duration, taught approximately once a week.

The information above is as offered/supported by the intervention provider.

Population characteristics as evaluated

8 to 11 years old

Level of need: Universal
Race and ethnicities: Not Reported

Model characteristics

School-based

Setting: Primary school
Workforce: Teachers
Evidence rating:
Cost rating:

Child outcomes:

  • Enhancing school achievement & employment
    • Improved self-regulatory behaviour
  • Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour
    • Improved behaviour
  • Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing
    • Improved emotional wellbeing

UK available

UK tested

Published: April 2025
Last reviewed: November 2019

Model description

MindUP is a universal social and emotional learning curriculum made available in separate versions for multiple age groups. The version described here is for children aged 8 to 11.

MindUP 8-11 is delivered by classroom teachers over 12 lessons of 40 to 50 minutes’ duration, taught approximately once a week. A core part of the intervention is learning a mindfulness breathing practice with focus on a single sound, which is intended to be practised for three minutes three times a day.

MindUP 8-11 lessons are divided across four units, which build on the content of previous units. The first six lessons covering Unit 1 (Introduction to Mindfulness) and Unit 2 (Mindfulness and Our Senses) introduce the concept of mindfulness and provide children with strategies for focusing their attention on sensory experiences.

Across the Unit 3 (Mindful of Our Thoughts and Feelings) lessons, children are taught adaptive thinking strategies, such as taking the perspective of others and adopting a positive outlook. Emotion regulation is also encouraged through children’s literature, working through scenarios, and learning visualisation.

Unit 4 (Mindful of Ourselves in the World) lessons focus on building children’s prosocial behaviours, using activities to encourage practising gratitude, discussion about the definition of kindness, and performing ‘acts of kindness’ outside of intervention lesson time.

Each lesson includes interactive activities and a mix of individual and group work. Additionally, children are encouraged to engage in core mindfulness strategies three times a day throughout the curriculum.

Age of child

8 to 11 years old

Target population

Primary school children

Disclaimer: The information in this section is as offered/supported by the intervention provider.

Why?

Science-based assumption

The ability to control thoughts, emotions, and behaviours is critical for success at school and in adulthood.

Science-based assumption

Classroom-based activities are useful in supporting children’s ability to concentrate and social and emotional self-regulatory skills.

Who?

Science-based assumption

All school-aged children can benefit from activities aimed at increasing their social and emotional awareness and regulation.

How?

Intervention

Children learn:

Mindfulness techniques aimed at increasing their concentration and awareness capabilities

Strategies for managing their emotions and behaviour

Strategies for interacting positively with others.

What?

Short-term

Children learn and can successfully apply mindfulness and emotion regulation techniques in the classroom.

Medium-term

Children demonstrate improved concentration skills and classroom achievement.

Long-term

Children achieve greater attainment at school

Children are better able to manage their emotions and behaviour in adolescence and adulthood.

Who is eligible?

Children aged 8 to 11 years old.

How is it delivered?

MindUP 8-11 is delivered in 12 sessions of 40 to 50 minutes’ duration each by one practitioner, to groups of children. Children also engage in a mindfulness practice every day for three minutes, three times a day.

What happens during the intervention?

Children participate in classes incorporating interaction and both individual and group work, which cover mindfulness-based strategies to focus attention, regulate emotions and engage in prosocial behaviours. Children are taught age-appropriate neuroscience underpinning the strategies. Children also participate in a regular mindfulness practice.

Who can deliver it?

Classroom teachers

What are the training requirements?

Teachers attend 26 hours of intervention training. Booster training of practitioners is not required.

How are the practitioners supervised?

It is recommended that practitioners are supervised by two MindUP consultants, with five days of intervention training and a MindUP school lead who is a teacher or member of the leadership team at the school offering MindUP.

What are the systems for maintaining fidelity?

Intervention fidelity is maintained through the following processes:

  • Training manual
  • Other printed material
  • Other online material
  • Face-to-face training
  • Fidelity monitoring
  • Teachers receive digital decks to teach each of the 15 lessons. Ongoing CPD sessions for MindUP school leads are provided.

Is there a licensing requirement?

No

Contact details*

Email address: hello@mindup.org

Website: www.mindup.org

*Please note that this information may not be up to date. In this case, please visit the listed intervention website for up to date contact details.

MindUP 8-11’s most rigorous evidence comes from a single RCT conducted in Canada, consistent with Foundations’ Level 2 evidence strength criteria.

This study identified statistically significant improvements in child empathy, perspective taking, optimism, emotional control, mindfulness, prosociality, popularity with peers, attention, planning and memory skills, school self-concept, and reductions in depressive symptoms and aggression.

MindUP 8-11 has preliminary evidence of improving a child’s outcome, but we cannot be confident that the intervention caused the improvement.

Search and review

Identified in search7
Studies reviewed3
Meeting the L2 threshold1
Meeting the L3 threshold0
Contributing to the L4 threshold0
Ineligible6

Study 1

Study designCluster RCT
CountryCanada
Sample characteristics

Participants were 99 fourth and fifth grade students (average age 10.24 years) from elementary schools in a suburban, predominantly middle-class community.

Race, ethnicities, and nationalities
  • 66% English as primary language
  • 25% primary language of East Asian origin
  • 10% other languages.
Population risk factors

None stated

Timing
  • Baseline
  • Post-intervention
Child outcomes
  • Improved empathy (child report)
  • Improved perspective taking (child report)
  • Improved optimism (child report)
  • Improved emotional control (child report)
  • Improved mindfulness (child report)
  • Decreased depressive symptoms (child report)
  • Increased prosocial behaviour (peer report)
  • Increased popularity with peers (peer report)
  • Decreased peer-rated aggression (peer report)
  • Improved attention, planning and memory skills (computer assessment)
  • Improved school self-concept (child report).
Other outcomes

None reported

Study rating2
Citations

Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Oberle, E., Lawlor, M. S., Abott, D., Thomson, K., Oberlander, T. F. & Diamond, A. (2015) Enhancing cognitive and social–emotional development through a simple-to-administer mindfulness-based school program for elementary school children: A randomized controlled trial. Developmental Psychology. 51 (1), 52–66.

The following studies were identified for this intervention but did not count towards the intervention’s overall evidence rating. An intervention receives the same rating as its most robust study or studies.

De Carvalho, J. S., Marques Pinto, A. & Marôco, J. (2017) Results of a mindfulness-based social-emotional learning program on Portuguese elementary students and teachers: A quasi-experimental study. Mindfulness. 8, 337–350. This reference refers to a quasi-experimental design, conducted in Portugal.

Harpin, S. B., Rossie, A. & Kim, A. K. (2016) Behavioral impacts of a mindfulness pilot intervention for elementary school students. Education. 137 (2), 149–156. This reference refers to a quasi-experimental design, conducted in the USA.

Schonert-Reichl, K. A. & Stewart Lawlor, M. (2010) The effects of a mindfulness-based education program on pre- and early adolescents’ well-being and social and emotional competence. Mindfulness. 1 (3), 137–151. This reference refers to a quasi-experimental design, conducted in Canada.

Note on provider involvement: This provider has agreed to Foundations’ terms of reference (or the Early Intervention Foundation’s terms of reference), and the assessment has been conducted and published with the full cooperation of the intervention provider.

Note on provider involvement: This provider has agreed to Foundations’ terms of reference (or the Early Intervention Foundation's terms of reference), and the assessment has been conducted and published with the full cooperation of the intervention provider.

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.