Multisystemic Therapy for Child Abuse and Neglect (MST-CAN) is an intensive intervention for families who have recently been reported to Child Protection Services for physically abusing and/or neglecting a child between the ages of 6 and 17. An MST-trained social worker or psychologist provides home-based therapeutic support to individual families for a four to six-month period with the aim of keeping children safe and stopping physically and emotionally abusive or neglectful parenting behaviours.
The information above is as offered/supported by the intervention provider.
6 to 17 years old
Individual
Child outcomes:
UK available
UK tested
Multisystemic Therapy for Child Abuse and Neglect (MST-CAN) is an intensive intervention for families who have recently been reported to Child Protection Services for physically abusing and/or neglecting a child between the ages of 6 and 17.
MST-CAN is delivered by an MST-CAN therapist (typically a social worker with a master’s level qualification) who provides the family with a tailored package of support that includes individual and family support and therapy. The therapist is available to the family on a 24/7 basis and carries a caseload of three to four families at a time. Therapists typically work with families for an average of six to nine months, and commonly see families around three times a week, although these visits will vary according to the level of need. A hybrid model of support delivered by keyworkers is also available in cases that are less severe, including those involving unsubstantiated neglect.
Referrals typically come from child protection services following concerns involving abuse or neglect occurring within the past 180 days. Child protection first contacts the family to ensure that the family is in agreement with the referral, and then refers the family to the MST team.
Within 48 hours of acceptance of the referral, the MST-CAN supervisor or the therapist assigned to the case will contact the family to explain the treatment and invite them to participate. When parents agree, a detailed intake assessment begins, which is carried out over a series of visits to the family’s home.
The primary aim of the first session is to engage family members and establish a collaborative partnership between the MST therapist, child protection services and the family. In some cases, it will become clear that the family is in crisis, so the first priority is to stabilise the family situation. If the child is out of the home at the time of referral, the MST-CAN worker will meet with foster parents or kinship carers to make sure that the child’s placement is stabilised until the child can return home.
A second aim of the initial sessions is to gain an understanding of the severity of the family’s circumstances and the multiple risks that may be contributing to the maltreating behaviour. This understanding is gained through meetings with child protection services, as well as meetings with the family.
At the beginning of the intervention, the MST-CAN worker and family work collaboratively to identify family-specific goals for positive change. These goals should be clearly linked to parenting behaviours that would be considered abusive and neglectful, with a primary aim of increasing the child’s safety. In the short term, it is expected that:
By the conclusion of the intervention, it is expected that:
MST-CAN therapists are trained and supervised to identify the risks associated with abuse and neglect, and are thus able to tailor the intervention to directly address these risks. MST therapists are also trained to treat a wide variety of mental health problems experienced by children and adults. MST teams are embedded well within the local system so that additional treatments, including pharmaceutical treatments prescribed by the NHS, can be used to address specific mental health conditions.
6 to 17 years
Families who have recently been reported to Child Protection Services for physically abusing and/or neglecting a child between the ages of 6 and 17.
Disclaimer: The information in this section is as offered/supported by the intervention provider.
Science-based assumption
Child maltreatment is a major public health concern that is associated with a broad array of adverse short- and long-term outcomes for children.
Science-based assumption
Child maltreatment is multi-determined by risks associated with the child, family, school, and community.
Science-based assumption
Families where there are serious concerns about a child’s physical and emotional welfare.
Intervention
MST-CAN therapists help families identify strengths within the family system to help them manage the multiple risks that are contributing to the maltreating behaviours.
Short-term
Maltreating parent behaviours stop
Child safety and stability in the home increases
Child wellbeing improves.
Medium-term
Reduced child maltreatment risk and recidivism
Reduced need for out-of-home placement
Reduced risk of child behavioural problems and other adverse child outcomes.
Long-term
Increased wellbeing throughout childhood
Improved life chances in adulthood.
Families who have recently been reported to Child Protection Services for physically abusing and/or neglecting a child between the ages of 6 and 17.
The MST-CAN therapist works closely with his or her MST-CAN expert, supervisor, and family to find a good ‘fit’ between the family’s issues and tailored strategies. This includes identifying barriers to the success of the intervention (e.g. parental substance misuse or mental health problems) and developing methods for removing these barriers.
A key aim of the intervention is to help families assume greater responsibility for their behaviours and actively work to resolve serious family issues.
MST-CAN therapists typically have a master’s qualification or higher in social work or clinical psychology.
Practitioners have 104 total hours of intervention training. Booster training of practitioners is recommended.
Intervention fidelity is maintained through the following processes:
Contact person: Cathy James
Email address: cathy.james@kcl.ac.uk
Website/s:
https://www.mstukandireland.org/
www.mstservices.com
*Please note that this information may not be up to date. In this case, please visit the listed intervention website for up to date contact details.
The most rigorous evidence for MST-CAN comes from a single RCT conducted in the United States, consistent with Foundations’ Level 3 evidence strength criteria. This study observed statistically significant improvements in children’s placement stability, the need for out-of-home placements, mental health, behaviour, and child maltreatment risk.
Reduced symptoms of child PTSD
Between the end of the intervention and 10 months later
Improvement index
Interpretation
Study
Reduced symptoms of child PTSD
Between the end of the intervention and 10 months later
Improvement index
Interpretation
Study
Reduced child dissociative symptoms
Between the end of the intervention and 10 months later
Improvement index
Interpretation
Study
Reduced Internalising symptoms
Between the end of the intervention and 10 months later
Improvement index
Interpretation
Study
Reduced neglect
Between the end of the intervention and 10 months later
Improvement index
Interpretation
Study
Reduced neglect
Between the end of the intervention and 10 months later
Improvement index
Interpretation
Study
Reduced psychological aggression
Between the end of the intervention and 10 months later
Improvement index
Interpretation
Study
Reduced minor assault
Between the end of the intervention and 10 months later
Improvement index
Interpretation
Study
Reduced severe assault
Between the end of the intervention and 10 months later
Improvement index
Interpretation
Study
Reduced severe assault
Between the end of the intervention and 10 months later
Improvement index
Interpretation
Study
Reduced non-violent discipline
Between the end of the intervention and 10 months later
Improvement index
Interpretation
Study
Reduced non-violent discipline
Between the end of the intervention and 10 months later
Improvement index
Interpretation
Study
Increased placement stability
Between the end of the intervention and 10 months later
Improvement index
Interpretation
Study
Reduced total problem behaviours
Between the end of the intervention and 10 months later
Improvement index
Interpretation
Study
Identified in search | 5 |
Studies reviewed | 1 |
Meeting the L2 threshold | 0 |
Meeting the L3 threshold | 1 |
Contributing to the L4 threshold | 0 |
Ineligible | 4 |
Study design | RCT |
Country | United States |
Sample characteristics | 90 parent–child dyads in families with a child between the ages of 6 and 17 |
Race, ethnicities, and nationalities |
|
Population risk factors |
|
Timing | 2, 4, 10, 16 months post-baseline |
Child outcomes | 16-months post-baseline (Change over time)
|
Other outcomes |
|
Study rating | 3 |
Citations | Swenson, C. C., Schaeffer, C. M., Henggeler, S. W., Faldowski, R. & Mayhew, A. M. (2010) Multisystemic Therapy for Child Abuse and Neglect: A randomized effectiveness trial. Journal of Family Psychology. 24 (4), 497. |
The following studies were identified for this intervention but did not count towards the intervention’s overall evidence rating. An intervention receives the same rating as its most robust study or studies.
Brunk, M. A., Henggeler, S. W. & Whelan, J. P. (1987) Comparison of multisystemic therapy and parent training in the brief treatment of child abuse and neglect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 55 (2), 171–178.
Schaeffer, C. M., Swenson, C. C., Tuerk, E. H. & Henggeler, S. W. (2013) Comprehensive treatment for co-occuring child maltreatment and parental substance abuse: Outcomes from a 24-month pilot study of the MST-Building Stronger Families programme. Child Abuse & Neglect. 37 (8), 596–60
Stallman, H. M., Walmsley, K. E., Bor, W., Collerson, M. E., Swenson, C. C. & McDermott., B. (2010) New directions in treatment of child physical abuse and neglect in Australia: MST CAN: A case study. Advances in Mental Health. 9 (2), 148–161.
Swenson, C. C., Schaeffer, C. M., Tuerk, E. H., Henggeler, S. W., Tuten, M., Panzarella, P., Lau, C., Remmele, L., Foley, T., Cannata, E. & Albert Guillorn, A. (2009) Adapting Multisystemic Therapy for co-occurring child maltreatment and parental substance abuse: The Building Stronger Families Project. Foundations.
Note on provider involvement: This provider has agreed to Foundations’ terms of reference (or the Early Intervention Foundation's terms of reference), and the assessment has been conducted and published with the full cooperation of the intervention provider.
Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.
Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.
Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.
Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.
Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.
Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.
Click here for more information.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.
Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.
Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.
Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.
Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.
Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.
Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.
Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.
Click here for more information.