New Forest Parenting Programme

The New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP) is for parents with a child between 3 and 11 years old with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). NFPP is delivered by a single practitioner to parents and children in their homes through eight weekly two-hour visits. During these visits, parents learn about ADHD symptoms and the ways in which they may affect their child’s behaviour and parents’ relationship with their child. Parents also learn strategies for managing their child’s behaviour and attention-related difficulties.

The information above is as offered/supported by the intervention provider.

Population characteristics as evaluated

3 to 11 years old

Level of need: Targeted-indicated
Race and ethnicities: African American, Asian, Hispanic, White, Other minoritised ethnic groups.

Model characteristics

Individual

Setting: Home
Workforce: Health visitors
Evidence rating:
Cost rating:

Child outcomes:

  • Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour
    • Improved behaviour
    • Reduced hyperactivity

UK available

UK tested

Published: April 2025
Last reviewed: July 2016

Model description

The New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP) is for families with a child between the ages of 3 and 11 with moderate to severe symptoms of Attention Deficit, Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

NFPP is delivered by a single practitioner to the parents and in their through eight weekly home visits lasting two hours each. During these visits, parents learn about the nature of ADHD and are introduced to a range of behavioural strategies for increasing their child’s attention and reducing challenging behaviour. Some of these strategies are taught through games that engage children’s attention, encourage their patience, and increase their concentration. The practitioner also observes the parent and child playing games together and provides feedback on the quality of their interaction.

The content is delivered as follows:

  • Week 1: (parent only) The practitioner discusses the nature of ADHD with the parent and introduces simple strategies, such as the use of praise and eye contact, to manage the child’s behaviour and attention.
  • Week 2: (parent only) The practitioner reviews the weekly diary with the parent and discusses the child’s behaviour. Parents learn how to develop routines, communicate clear messages, set limits, and avoid confrontation.
  • Week 3: (parent and child) Parents learn how to manage their child’s temper tantrums and difficult behaviour through the use of firm limits and distraction strategies.
  • Week 4: (parent and child) Parents learn how to use time out and quiet time effectively.
  • Week 5: (parent only) The practitioner and parent assess the success of the new strategies.
  • Weeks 6&7: (parent and child) The practitioner observes the parent and child interacting for 15 minutes. The practitioner then provides feedback about the quality of the interaction.
  • Week 8: (parent only) The practitioner reviews the key messages from the previous weeks and discusses strategies for managing behaviours that may still be challenging.

Age of child

3 to 11 years old

Target population

  • Children who score more than 20 on the Werry-Weiss-Peters Activity Scale (Routh, 1978)
  • Children meeting clinically validated cutoffs on the Parental Account of Childhood Symptoms (PACS) ADHD/Hyperkinesis scale
  • Parents reporting that their child’s condition is associated with impairment significant enough to warrant clinical intervention.

Disclaimer: The information in this section is as offered/supported by the intervention provider.

Why?

Science-based assumption

ADHD is a common developmental disorder impacting children’s behaviour and ability to concentrate

Symptoms of ADHD can negatively impact children’s success at school and relationship with others.

Science-based assumption

Effective parenting behaviours can help children with ADHD better manage their behaviour and concentrate better at school.

Who?

Science-based assumption

Parents with a child diagnosed with ADHD frequently benefit from further support .

How?

Intervention

Parents learn:

How ADHD symptoms impact children’s behaviour

How to respond positively to their child’s behaviour

Strategies for reinforcing positive child behaviour

Strategies for helping children manage their emotions

Strategies for helping children control their impulses

Methods for helping children concentrate for longer periods of time.

What?

Short-term

Parental stress reduces

Parent–child interaction improves

Children are better able to manage their emotions and impulses.

Medium-term

Children’s self-regulatory capabilities and behaviour improves

Children are better able to engage positively with others.

Long-term

Children are at less risk of antisocial behaviour in adolescence

Children experience greater success at school.

Who is eligible?

Children aged between 3 and 11 years old with moderate to severe symptoms of ADHD.

How is it delivered?

The NFPP is delivered in eight sessions of between one and 1.5 hours’ duration each, by one senior family-support worker, psychologist, health visitor, or nursery nurse to individual families.

What happens during the intervention?

During the weekly visits, parents are made aware of symptoms and signs of ADHD and the ways in which they may affect their child’s behaviour and their relationship with their child.

Parents also learn strategies for managing their child’s behaviour and attention difficulties. Some of these strategies are taught through games that engage children’s attention, encourage their patience, and increase their concentration.

The practitioner observes the parent and child playing the game together and provides feedback on the quality of their interaction.

Who can deliver it?

The practitioner who delivers this intervention is a senior family-support worker, psychologist, health visitor, or nursery nurse.

What are the training requirements?

The practitioners have 24 hours of intervention training. Booster training of practitioners is recommended.

How are the practitioners supervised?

It is recommended that practitioners supervised by one intervention developer supervisor , and one host-agency supervisor.

What are the systems for maintaining fidelity?

Intervention fidelity is maintained through the following processes:

  • Training manual
  • Other printed material
  • Face-to-face training
  • Fidelity monitoring
  • Supervision
  • Accreditation or certification process
  • Booster training.

Is there a licensing requirement?

Yes

Contact details*

Contact person: Cathy Laver-Bradbury
Organisation: CAMHS, The Orchard Centre
Email address: cathy.laver-bradbury@solent.nhs.uk
Website: https://nfppprogram.com/

*Please note that this information may not be up to date. In this case, please visit the listed intervention website for up to date contact details.

NFPP’s most rigorous evidence comes from two RCTs consistent with Foundations’ Level 3 evidence strength criteria. Evidence from at least one level 3 study, along with evidence from other studies rated 2 or better qualifies NFPP for a 3+ rating.

The first study was conducted in the UK, observing statistically significant reductions in NFPP parents’ reports of their children’s behaviour, hyperactivity and attention compared to families not receiving the intervention. This difference was observed immediately after the intervention had finished and then again at a 15-month follow-up assessment. This study also observed significant improvements in NFPP parents’ reports of their own mental health relative to those not receiving the intervention, as well as increased satisfaction in their parenting role.

The second study was conducted in the United States, observing statistically significant reductions in NFPP parents’ reports of their children’s symptoms of ADHD compared to parents not receiving the intervention. This study also observed significant improvements in researcher observation of parenting behaviours compared to parents not receiving the intervention.

NFPP can be described as evidence-based: it has evidence from at least one rigorously conducted RCT or QED demonstrating a statistically significant positive impact on at least one child outcome.

Child outcomes

Reduced conduct problems

post-intervention

Improvement index

+10

Interpretation

1.69-point improvement on the Parental Account of Childhood Symptoms Scale

Study

1

Reduced conduct problems

15 weeks follow-up

Improvement index

+13

Interpretation

2.14-point improvement on the Parental Account of Childhood Symptoms Scale

Study

1

Reduced inattentive behaviour

post-intervention

Improvement index

+43

Interpretation

2.73-point improvement on the ADHD-Rating Scale-IV

Study

2

Reduced inattentive behaviour

post-intervention

Improvement index

+31

Interpretation

11.71-point improvement on the Conners Rating Scale-Revised (Inattentive Scale)

Study

2

Reduced hyperactive/impulsive behaviour

post-intervention

Improvement index

+33

Interpretation

9.83-point improvement on the Conners Rating Scale-Revised (Hyperactive/Impulsive Scale)

Study

2

Reduced hyperactive/impulsive behaviour

post-intervention

Improvement index

+45

Interpretation

1.84-point improvement on the ADHD-Rating Scale-IV

Study

2

Reduced hyperactivity

post-intervention

Improvement index

+33

Interpretation

5.55-point improvement on the Parental Account of Childhood Symptoms Scale

Study

1

Reduced hyperactivity

post-intervention

Improvement index

+4

Interpretation

1.51-point improvement on a measure of observed attention and engagement

Study

1

Reduced hyperactivity

15 weeks follow-up

Improvement index

+31

Interpretation

5.28-point improvement on the Parental Account of Childhood Symptoms Scale

Study

1

Reduced hyperactivity

15 weeks follow-up

Improvement index

+26

Interpretation

11.91-point improvement on a measure of observed attention and engagement

Study

1

Reduced defiant behaviour

post-intervention

Improvement index

+22

Interpretation

0.26-point improvement on the New York Parent Rating Scale

Study

2

Reduced behaviour problems

post-intervention

Improvement index

+34

Interpretation

11.18-point improvement on the Conners Rating Scale-Revised

Study

2

Reduced behaviour problems

post-intervention

Improvement index

+45

Interpretation

4.57-point improvement on the ADHD-Rating Scale-IV

Study

2

Search and review

Identified in search4
Studies reviewed2
Meeting the L2 threshold0
Meeting the L3 threshold2
Contributing to the L4 threshold0
Ineligible2

Study 1

Study designRCT
CountryUnited Kingdom
Sample characteristics

78 children aged three with symptoms of ADHD.

Race, ethnicities, and nationalities

Not reported

Population risk factors

18% of families were from social classes 5 or 6 (unskilled occupations)

Timing
  • Baseline
  • Post-intervention (eight weeks after baseline)
  • 15-week follow-up (23 weeks after baseline).
Child outcomes
  • Reduced ADHD symptoms (parent report)
  • Reduced conduct problems (parent report).
Other outcomes
  • Improved maternal mental health (parent report)
  • Improved parental satisfaction (parent report)
  • Improved parental efficacy (parent report).
Study rating3
Citations

Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., Daley, D., Thompson, M., Laver-Bradbury, C. & Weeks, A. (2001) Parent-based therapies for preschool attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A randomized, controlled trial with a community sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 40, 402–408.

Study 2

Study designRCT
CountryUnited States
Sample characteristics

164 children aged 3 to 5 with symptoms of ADHD living in New York

Race, ethnicities, and nationalities
  • 69.2% White
  • 25.6% Hispanic
  • 16.4% African American
  • 8.8% Asian
  • 5.6% Other.
Population risk factors

76.4% of mothers and 60.3% of fathers were college graduates

Timing
  • Baseline
  • Post-intervention (eight weeks after baseline)
  • 6.8-month follow-up.
Child outcomes
  • Reduced total symptoms of ADHD (parent and clinician report)
  • Reduced inattentive behaviour (parent and clinician report)
  • Reduced hyperactivity/impulsive behaviour (parent and clinician report)
  • Reduced defiant behaviours (parent report).
Other outcomes

Improved parenting practices (parent report)

Study rating3
Citations

Abikoff, H. B., Thompson, M., Laver-Bradbury, C., Long, N., Forehand, R. L., Miller Brotman, L., Klein, R. G., Reiss, P., Huo, L. & Sonuga-Barke, E. (2015). Parent training for preschool ADHD: A randomized controlled trial of specialized and generic programs. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 56, 618–631.

The following studies were identified for this intervention but did not count towards the intervention’s overall evidence rating. An intervention receives the same rating as its most robust study or studies.

Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., Thompson, M., Daley, D. & Laver-Bradbury, C. (2004) Parent training for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Is it as effective when delivered as routine rather than as specialist care? British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 43, 449–457.

Thompson, M. J. J., Laver-Bradbury, C., Ayres, M., le Poidevin, E., Mead, S., Dodds, C., Psychogiou, L., Bitsakou, P., Daley, D., Weeks, A., Miller Brotman, L., Abikoff, H., Thompason, P. & Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S. (2009) A small-scale randomized controlled trial of the revised New Forest Parenting Programme for preschoolers with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. European Journal of Adolescent Psychiatry. 18, 605–616.

Note on provider involvement: This provider has agreed to Foundations’ terms of reference (or the Early Intervention Foundation's terms of reference), and the assessment has been conducted and published with the full cooperation of the intervention provider.

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.