Involving families in reducing parental conflict (RPC) service planning

Local area case studies

Involving families in reducing parental conflict (RPC) service planning

This interactive resource explores three case studies from local areas (Bolton, Haringey and Wigan) on the work they are doing to involve families in service planning. It shares emerging learning around amplifying enablers and overcoming barriers in developing local areas’ work on involving families in RPC service planning.

As part of the National RPC programme, there is a focus on representing families’ voices and lived experience in local areas’ strategy and service design. Co-designing RPC services with children, young people and families who may have experienced parental conflict helps ensure that services are accessible, acceptable and effective.

Through Foundations’ interactions with local areas, we have identified that there is still further work needed to understand and overcome barriers to involving families in RPC service planning to maximise the impact of RPC support.

This resource can support local leaders in reflecting on their local practice in involving families in service planning and design.

This resource builds on our summary of local area practice on enablers for involving families in RPC service planning.

Local case studies: Involving families in RPC service planning

Interactive PowerPoint presentation

Download

“In Haringey, we are proud of our RPC offer, and recent theory of change work has highlighted that we need to ‘go back to basics’ to understand what our families need before a targeted approach or intervention is required. We want to build on our be curious ethos and find out from our parents what a clear universal pathway for families experiencing conflict looks like, particularly those who are less likely to engage because of stigma or cultural and language barriers.”

– Experienced RPC lead, Haringey

“Bolton want to consider how they can better engage families in RPC service planning across the spectrum of support, this includes families who are already involved in targeted help accessing parental conflict support, families engaged in universal support who aren’t accessing parental conflict services, and minoritised ethnic families who are underrepresented in Early Help services.”

– Experienced RPC lead, Bolton

“Based on parental feedback it has been highlighted to us that follow up contact post attendance on a programme is currently an unmet need. We in Wigan want to learn from this project how a follow up offer that is shaped and developed by parents can reduce re-referrals into the system and improve the overall parental journey and experience.”

– Experienced RPC lead, Wigan
SHARE

Related Publications

Use of evidence-based tools and guidance in service design and commissioning

Evaluating Reducing Parental Conflict training in Essex

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.