There are numerous interventions for families experiencing domestic abuse. However, because evaluations vary in both what and how they measure, it is unclear which programmes are most effective . To mitigate this issue, previous work was conducted to develop a ‘core outcome set’ (DVA-COS) —a small number of outcomes that researchers, service providers, and survivors of domestic abuse agree are the most important to measure: 1) child emotional health and wellbeing; 2) feelings of safety; 3) caregiver emotional health and wellbeing; 4) family relationships; 5) freedom to go about daily life. The DVA-COS aims to help service commissioners and survivors understand the possible benefits of one programme over another.
We commissioned the University of Sussex to carry out a project building on this previous work. This project aims to provide recommendations as to how the five outcomes in the DVA-COS should be measured. Specifically it seeks to:
The overall aim of the project was to develop agreement on how to measure domestic abuse outcomes consistently. Even where there is consensus on the outcome construct that should be measured, for example “emotional wellbeing”, it is difficult to compare the effectiveness of different programmes when different measurement tools are used. This inconsistency leads to wasted research and evaluation efforts.
This project had two specific aims:
The first aim was addressed using an iterative, mixed methods design. This included stakeholder consultation, systematic literature searches, evaluation of tools for scientific strength, usability and acceptability, and consensus methods.
The second aim was addressed using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to explore the validity and acceptability of the SWEMWBS and WEMWBS for children and adults with experience of domestic abuse.
Previous work has identified a common set of outcomes that researchers, service providers, and survivors of domestic abuse agree are the most important to measure. This project went one step further and identified ways to measure these outcomes that are valid and acceptable to children and adults affected by domestic abuse. This can help policy makers, service commissioners and survivors understand the possible benefits of one programme over another. Further thought is needed as to how the outcome set can be integrated into existing systems and processes to support the use and collection of data for service evaluation and improvement.
This work makes important strides towards the realisation of a DVA-COS, which will help unify outcome measurement across research and practice contexts. Continued work is required to further develop and evaluate selected measures, as well as to develop a new tool to measure freedom to go about daily life. Further work is needed to describe and evaluate the implementation of the DVA-COS, and to track the benefits and harms associated with outcome harmonisation in this field of research and practice.
You can view the project linked to this publication here:
Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.
Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.
Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.
Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.
Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.
Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.
Click here for more information.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.
Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.
Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.
Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.
Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.
Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.
Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.
Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.
Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.
Click here for more information.