VIRTUAL AND DIGITAL INTERVENTIONS RAPID REVIEW

A rapid evidence review to identify virtual and digital parenting interventions.
Completed Project

This project has now been completed. The linked publication can be viewed here:

Virtual and Digital Interventions Rapid Review

Summary

The purpose of this rapid evidence review is to identify virtual and digital parenting interventions to build the evidence base supporting the effective delivery of Family Hubs and early years services in local areas and synthesising the existing evidence is the first step in this process.

The anticipated timeline of the review is March 2023 to September 2023.

Who, what, why and how?

The aim of this review is to address the current gap in knowledge about virtual and digital delivery of interventions for families with a child between conception and age 5 that could be offered by Family Hubs within the 4 priority areas:

– Parenting support
– Parent–infant relationships and perinatal mental health
– Support for children’s early language and the home learning environment
-Infant feeding

The review will be conducted by Cordis Bright through a desk-based synthesis of secondary data which involves analysing and integrating findings from various sources to develop a unified understanding or summary of the subject matter. Cordis Bright will conduct a narrative synthesis of both qualitative and quantitative findings. This will provide a basic descriptive summary of the studies and the results.

Research Questions

The research questions for this review are as follows:

  • To what extent do effective virtual and digital interventions corresponding with the 4 Family Hubs funded areas exist?
  • What is the impact of these interventions on important child outcomes?
  • What do we know about their differential impacts on different groups of families on the basis of sociodemographic factors such as age, race, gender, and socioeconomic status?
  • What are the conditions for the success, or failure, of these interventions in practice?
  • What is the acceptability/feasibility of these interventions for families in practice?

 

The review will highlight differences between sociodemographic groups across all research questions. To select data based on predefined characteristics, a purposive sampling strategy will be used. Data extraction tables will capture information from 75 key articles, including title, date, study type, sample, mode of delivery, key findings, and evidence quality.

 

To enhance ease of interpretation each article will be categorized based on its mode of delivery. A shorter list of the most relevant publications will be selected using the data extraction table for further review. These resources will be analysed and reported in relation to the research questions through a thematic analysis. Data extraction tables will be created to summarize the characteristics and findings of the studies.

Evaluation partners

Due Date

This project is due to be completed by September 2023.
SHARE

Research Protocol

This project was undertaken by What Works for Children's Social Care (now Foundations)

Download

Related Projects

An umbrella review of parenting interventions for parents and caregivers of children and young people with disabilities

Effective interventions and practices for parents experiencing complex and multiple needs

Cost ratings:

Rated 1: Set up and delivery is low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of less than £100.

Rated 2: Set up and delivery is medium-low cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £100–£499.

Rated 3: Set up and delivery is medium cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £500–£999.

Rated 4: Set up and delivery is medium-high cost, equivalent to an estimated unit cost of £1,000–£2,000.

Rating 5: Set up and delivery is high cost. Equivalent to an estimated unit cost of more than £2,000.

Set up and delivery cost is not applicable, not available, or has not been calculated.

Click here for more information.

Child Outcomes:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Supporting children’s mental health and wellbeing: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing child maltreatment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Enhancing school achievement & employment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing crime, violence and antisocial behaviour: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing substance abuse: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing risky sexual behaviour & teen pregnancy: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Preventing obesity and promoting healthy physical development: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient.

Evidence ratings:

Rated 2: Has preliminary evidence of improving a child outcome from a quantitative impact study, but there is not yet evidence of causal impact.

Rated 2+: Meets the level 2 rating and the best available evidence is based on a study which is more rigorous than a level 2 standard but does not meet the level 3 standard.

Rated 3: Has evidence of a short-term positive impact from at least one rigorous study.

Rated 3+: Meets the level 3 rating and has evidence from other studies with a comparison group at level 2 or higher.

Rated 4: Has evidence of a long-term positive impact through at least two rigorous studies.

Rated 4+: Meets the level 4 rating and has at least a third study contributing to the Level 4 rating, with at least one of the studies conducted independently of the intervention provider.

Rating has a *: The evidence base includes mixed findings i.e., studies suggesting positive impact alongside studies, which on balance, indicate no effect or negative impact.

Click here for more information.